Skip to main content

What Is Wrong With Generic Drugs?

Photo by Laurynas Mereckas on Unsplash

The other day I went to my General Practitioner for a routine checkup. There was a man complaining about the different reactions in his body after changing regular branded medicine with a generic one.

Being a healthcare industry professional, I was curious to know more about him and the reactions inside his body. So, I contacted my GP and asked him whether it is natural to have some adverse reaction after switching from branded to generic versions of drugs?

The answer was yes.

He showed me a series of complaints from different patients across the world on generic drugs. Some of them either didn’t work on patients or led to some devastating side effects.

After an hour-long conversation with my GP, I realized that something is wrong with these Generic Drugs, but the question is what?

What is wrong with generic drugs?

Why is it causing such reactions in our bodies?

So, I decided to dig more into generic drugs. I mined hundreds of reports related to generic drugs, and I found one thing in common with all those reports. Every report had one or more complaints associated with it.

I followed the trail of certain generic drugs around the world, trying to find answers to different questions.

Source: Canva.com

A Perfect Deception:

“A con artist makes money through a maze of deception.”

A con artist lies and cheats individuals into the feeling that they are doing a great deal, making huge profits. But in actual sense, they’re the only one who makes money. The only thing that matters to a con artist is a perfect con and for this, they perfect a total lack of conscience.

But why am I mentioning a deception?

What has a con artist to do with generic drugs?

A pharmaceutical giant, Ranbaxy, a manufacturer of the generic version of drugs like Lipitor holds a history of one of the biggest frauds in the pharmaceutical industry.

The company used lower-quality ingredients, manipulated the quality control data, and even made up numbers out of thin air to follow the regulatory standards.

They submitted the bioequivalence data to FDA which was made up altogether because there were no actual data that exist. The company was trading drugs of dubious purity, thus endangering patient safety.

Further investigations found that Ranbaxy had a consistent pattern of submitting “untrue statements.”On at least 15 new generic drug applications, auditors found more than 1,600 data errors. Their drugs were “potentially unsafe and illegal to sell.”

They actually used fraud as a competitive advantage to build and grow the business in the U.S.

It is not a one-off scandal just the tip of the iceberg.

There are many drug manufacturers who have deceived regulatory bodies around the world by submitting false data to make their generic drug appear bioequivalent to the branded drug.

Drug manufacturers around the world are fooling regulators, consumers, and the health of people for the sake of their profits.

There was another case related to generic drugs. Some patients who switched to a generic version of Wellbutrin, an antidepressant, complained of headaches, nausea, irritability, and even suicidal thoughts.

It took the FDA five years to verify that the generic pills produced by the Israeli manufacturer Teva were not equivalent to brand name Wellbutrin.

Source: Canva.com

Who is responsible for all this?

Not only medical companies but regulatory bodies are also responsible for these practices. During an audit or regulatory inspection in the US generally, FDA inspectors show up at a plant at any random time. Thus, incentivizing companies to always be in compliance lest fear of getting caught off guard by an inspection. But the globalization of the pharmaceutical industry complicated this practice. To avoid diplomatic tensions, the FDA notifies companies months in advance of visits. Such lead time gave overseas companies ample time to prepare for inspections. By that time company cleans workspaces, shreds records, and fabricates documents. Some of them even destroy contaminated drugs.

For avoiding such false practices and fraud, we need strict regulations as well as a compliance team. If the officers visit the sites without any prior notice, incentivize these companies to always be in compliance with regulatory norms.

With regular checks and visits, we can develop a fear of regulatory bodies among companies. Thus, avoiding the false practices and poor culture of these industries.

Strict laws coupled with strict regulations and regular random audits would lead to safe and bioequivalent versions of the drug. All the people working in healthcare need to be self-responsible for ensuring the safety, efficiency, and efficacy of drugs.

Due to our lack of responsibility and poor practices, someone could suffer. Regulators could implement strict regulations, but it’s us, who are going to implement and follow those norms in the healthcare industry.

It takes “TWO” hands to clap not just “ONE.”

Photo by visuals on Unsplash

Share your views in the comment section.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Care 101: Tips for Prioritizing Your Health and Well-Being in Your Daily Routine

Photo by  Roberto Nickson  on  Unsplash S elf-care is a buzzword that has been gaining popularity in recent years and for good reason. It refers to the deliberate actions we take to improve our physical, emotional, and mental health and well-being. As we go about our daily lives, it's easy to forget about our own needs and put others first. However, practicing self-care is essential to living a healthy and fulfilling life. In this blog, we'll explore the importance of self-care and provide practical tips for implementing it into your daily routine. Why Is Self-Care Important? Self-care is essential for maintaining good health and well-being. It helps reduce stress, improve sleep quality, boost self-esteem, and increase overall happiness. When we take care of ourselves, we have more energy and are better equipped to handle life's challenges. It's important to note that self-care isn't selfish, it's necessary. We cannot take care of others if we don't take ca...

The Coronation of King Charles III: A Celebration of Tradition and Innovation

Photo by  Chris Boland  on  Unsplash T he coronation of King Charles III marks a historic moment in the British monarchy's long and illustrious history. It is a moment of transition, marking the end of an era and the beginning of a new one. The ceremony, which is steeped in tradition and symbolism, is a celebration of the country's cultural heritage and national identity. The coronation is not just a formality; it is a crucial event that signals the continuity and change that the British monarchy has undergone over the years. It is a demonstration of the royal family's determination to remain relevant in a rapidly changing world while preserving its historic and cultural significance. The ceremony is an expression of the monarchy's deep connection to the British people, their values, and their aspirations. Despite being a solemn occasion, the coronation will also incorporate some modern touches. The ceremony will be shorter, and the food will be more contemporary, refl...

Understanding Article 142 and the Debate Over the Supreme Court's Power to Grant Divorces

Photo by  IƱaki del Olmo  on  Unsplash T he Supreme Court of India is currently deliberating on a case concerning its powers under Article 142 of the Indian Constitution to grant divorces. This case has significant implications for divorce laws in India and for the separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature. Article 142 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Supreme Court to pass any order necessary to do "complete justice" in any matter pending before it. In recent years, the Supreme Court has used its powers under this article to grant divorces in cases where personal laws are inadequate or discriminatory. However, some legal experts have argued that the use of Article 142 to grant divorces undermines the principle of separation of powers between the judiciary and the legislature. They argue that divorce laws should be formulated by the legislature and not by the judiciary, as the legislature is better equipped to consider the social, cultural, and ...